¿Es la semilla de origen local el mejor material genético para efectos de restauración?
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Se cuestiona el paradigma de que las semillas de origen local son la mejor alternativa para efectos de restauración. Al respecto, se describen situaciones en que el uso de semillas foráneas o mezclas de semillas locales y foráneas resultan opciones más adecuadas que el mero uso de semilla local. Se plantea que estas consideraciones contribuirán a mejorar la selección del origen de las semillas utilizadas para plantaciones de restauración, permitiendo así mejorar el grado de éxito de estas iniciativas.
Referencias
Bozzano, M., Jalonen, R., Thomas, E., Boshier, D., Gallo, L., Cavers, S., Bordács, S. et al. (Eds). (2014). Genetic considerations in ecosystem restoration using native tree species. State of the World’s Forest Genetic Resources –Thematic Study. Rome, FAO and Bioversity International. 281 p.
Breed, MF., Stead, MG., Ottewell, KM., Gardner, MG. & Lowe, AJ. (2013). Which provenance and where? Seed sourcing strategies for revegetation in a changing environment. Conservation Genetics, N° 14. Pp: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-012-0425-z
Breed, MF., Gardner, MG., Ottewell, KM., Navarro, CM. & Lowe, A. (2012). Shifts in reproductive assurance strategies and inbreeding costs associated with habitat fragmentation in Central American mahogany. Ecol. Lett., N° 15. Pp: 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01752.x
Breed, MF., Ottewell, KM., Gardner, MG. & Lowe, AJ. (2011). Clarifying climate change adaptation responses for scattered trees in modified landscapes. J. Appl. Ecol., N° 48. Pp: 637–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01969.x
Broadhurst, L. & Boshier, D.H. (2014). Seed provenance for restoration and management: conserving evolutionary potential and utility. En: Bozzano, M., Jalonen, R., Thomas, E., Boshier, D., Gallo, L., Cavers, S., Bordács, S. et al. (Eds). Genetic considerations in ecosystem restoration using native tree species. state of the world’s forest genetic resources. Thematic Study. FAO and Bioversity International. Rome. Pp: 27-38
Endler, J., Mazer, S. Williams, M. Sandoval, C. & Ferren, W. (2010). Problems associated with the introduction of non-native genotypes on NRS reserves. University of California, Natural Reserve System, Committee to evaluate introduction of exotic genotypes into UC Reserves. En: https://www.ucnrs.org/staff/admin_handbook/APP-18ABCD-Use-Application/Non-Native-Genotype.pdf
Erikson, V. & Halford, A. (2020). Seed planning, sourcing and procurement. Restoration Ecology, 28(s3):s216-s224. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13199
Gellie, NJC., Breed, MF., Thurgate, N., Kennedy, SA. & Lowe, AJ. (2016). Local maladaptation in a foundation tree species: Implications for restoration. Biological Conservation, N° 203. Pp: 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.036.
Gutiérrez, B. (2021). Consideraciones genéticas para la obtención de semillas y viverización de plantas para restauración. En: Ipinza, R., Gutiérrez, B., Molina, M. & Barros, S. (Eds). Buenas prácticas y consideraciones genéticas para recuperación de bosques nativos degradados. Instituto Forestal-Fondo Investigación del Bosque Nativo. Cap. 9. Pp: 221-237. https://doi.org/10.52904/20.500.12220/31302
Gutiérrez, B. (2020). Desempeño de progenies, procedencias y regiones de procedencias de roble (Nothofagus obliqua (Mirb) Oerst). Ciencia & Investigación Forestal, 26(3):33-50. https://doi.org/10.52904/0718-4646.2020.536
Gutiérrez, B. (2017). Evaluación de crecimiento y forma de fuste de un ensayo de procedencias y progenies de coihue (Nothofagus dombeyi (Mirb.) Oerst.) de 15 años de edad. Ciencia & Investigación Forestal, 23(3): 31-42. https://doi.org/10.52904/0718-4646.2017.484
Hancock, N., Leishman, MR. & Hughes, L. (2013). Testing the ‘local provenance’ paradigm: A common garden experiment in Cumberland Plain Woodland, Sydney, Australia. Restoration Ecology, N°21. Pp: 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.2013.21.issue-5
Hancock, N. & Hughes, L. (2014). Turning up the heat on the provenance debate: Testing the ‘local is best’ paradigm under heatwave conditions. Austral Ecology, N° 39. Pp: 600–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.2014.39.issue-5
Havens, K., Vitt, P., Still, S., Kramer, AT., Fant, JB. & Schatz, K. (2015). Seed sourcing for restoration in an era of climate change. Nat. Areas Jour., N° 35. Pp: 122–133. https://doi.org/10.3375/043.035.0116.
Ipinza, R. & Gutiérrez, B. (2014). Consideraciones genéticas para la restauración ecológica. Ciencia & Investigación Forestal, 20(2): 51-72. https://doi.org/10.52904/0718-4646.2014.421
Jones, T. (2013). When local isn't best. Evol. Appl., N° 6. Pp: 1109–1118. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12090
Jones, T. (2003). The Restoration Gene Pool Concept: Beyond the Native Versus Non-Native Debate. Restoration Ecology Vol. 11 N° 3, pp. 281-290. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00064.x
Jones, T. y Monaco, TA. (2007). Restoration Practitioner´s Guide to the Restoration Gene Pool Concept. Ecological Restoration 25:1. March 2007 pp. 12-19. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.25.1.12
Krauss, S., Sinclair, E., Bussell, J. & Hobbs, R. (2013). An ecological genetic delineation of local seed-source provenance for ecological restoration. Ecology and Evolution, 3(7): 2138–2149. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.595
Lowe, A.J. (2010). Composite provenancing of seed for restoration: progressing the 'local is best' paradigm for seed sourcing. The State of Australia's Birds 2009: restoring woodland habitats for birds. Compiled by David Paton and James O'Connor. Supplement to Wingspan 20(1) March.
McKay, JK., Christian, CE., Harrison, S. & Rice, KJ. (2005). How local is local? a review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restoration Ecology, N° 13. Pp: 432–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00058.x
Mijnsbrugge, KV., Bischoff, A., Smith, B. (2010). A question of origin: Where and how to collect seed for ecological restoration. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11(2010): 300-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2009.09.002
Murawski, D.A., Nimal Gunatilleke, I.A.U. & Bawa, K.S. (1994). The effects of selective logging on inbreeding in Shorea megistophylla (Dipterocarpaceae) from Sri Lanka. Conserv. Biol., N° 8. Pp: 997–1002. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08040997.x
Ng, K.K.S., Lee, S.L. & Ueno, S. (2009). Impact of selective logging on genetic diversity of two tropical tree species with contrasting breeding systems using direct comparison and simulation methods. For. Ecol. Manage., N° 257. Pp: 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.08.035
Nolan, MP., Luong, JC., Valliere, JM., Mazer, SJ. & D'Antonio, CM. (2023). Rethinking local seed sourcing for the restoration of a foundational grass species in California. Restor. Ecol., e13992. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13992
Pizza, RB., Foster, J. & Brudvig, LA. (2023). Where should they come from? Where should they go? Several measures of seed source locality fail to predict plant establishment in early prairie restorations. Ecological Solutions and Evidence, 4, e12223. https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12223
Robinson, JM., Breed, MF., Maher, NL., Gibson, D., Ducki, LC., Standish, RJ., Veneklaas, EJ. et al. (2023). Putting provenance into perspective: the relative importance of restoration site conditions over seed sourcing. Restor Ecol., e13989. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13989
Sgrò, C.M., Lowe, A.J. & Hoffmann, A.A. (2011). Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change. Evol. Appl., N° 4. Pp: 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00157.x
Thomas, E., Jalonen, R., Loo, J., Boshier, D., Gallo, L., Cavers, S., Bordács, S., Smith, P. & Bozzano, M. 2014. Genetic considerations in ecosystem restoration using native tree species. Forest Ecology and Management, 333 (2014): 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.015
Thomas, E., Jalonen, R., Loo, J. & Bozzano, M. (2015). Cómo evitar el fracaso en la restauración forestal: la importancia de disponer de un germoplasma genéticamente diverso y adaptado a los sitios de plantación. Unasylva N° 245. Pp: 29-36.
Vitt, P., Finch, J., Barak, RS., Braum, A., Frischie, S. & Redlinski, I. (2022). Seed sourcing strategies for ecological restoration under climate change: A review of the current literature. Front. Conserv. Sci., 3:938110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2022.938110
Vranckx, G., Jacquemyn, H., Muys, B. & Honnay, O. (2012). Meta-analysis of susceptibility of woody plants to loss of genetic diversity through habitat fragmentation. Conserv. Biol., N° 26. Pp: 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01778.x
Descargas
Los trabajos publicados en Ciencia & Investigación Forestal se rigen por la licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
En lo esencial esta licencia involucra que los autores conservan sus derechos de autor, y que los lectores puedan de forma gratuita descargar, almacenar, copiar y distribuir la versión final aprobada y publicada del trabajo, siempre y cuando se realice sin fines comerciales y se cite la fuente y autoría de la obra.